IN A COUNTRY on the edge of a desert roughly the size of the United States, hunger is a way of life. Even in years when the rains are satisfactory, villagers’ stock of food dwindles while they wait to reap next year’s harvest. The period is what Peace Corps Volunteers call “hungry season,” and roughly, from June until harvesting begins in late September, one meal must suffice. That meal is made of millet, which women pound into flour and cook into a thick paste, the consistency that would result from putting too many oats in boiling water while preparing oatmeal.
This year hungry season has begun many months earlier, and in the unluckiest villages, the supply of millet has long been depleted, forcing large families to forage for berries and leaves, sell their livestock, and migrate south, away from the desert, to find work and beg for food. The current situation is so desperate because nature was particularly cruel to Niger last year. In certain areas of the country the rain did not fall often enough, and swarms of locusts devoured the crop that somehow managed to grow out of the sandy soil. Altogether yields fell by 80 percent. What was harvested was quickly consumed, and livestock had nothing to graze. The hunger set in earlier than usual, and without food for such a prolonged period, people are now beginning to starve.
The international organization that has been sounding the alarm the loudest about the food crisis in Niger is Doctors Without Borders (DWB). Well-known for its quick response in providing emergency care to hotspots worldwide, DWB also intervenes in countries where the health care system does not have the resources to provide adequate care. Since August 2001, DWB has operated a malnutrition clinic in Maradi, the city where I lived until March, when I moved nine hours west to Niamey. Treating children up to five years old who suffer from severe malnutrition, the clinic is the center for what DWB calls “one of the organization's biggest nutritional operations in the past 30 years.” At the beginning of this year, the staff at the clinic noticed they were treating an abnormally high number of children, and the numbers confirmed their suspicion. In February an American doctor with DWB came to Peace Corps Volunteers in Maradi and asked them about the state of their villages, specifically those clustered around Dakoro, a prefectural capital of 10,000 eighty miles north of Maradi. My friends’ matter-of-fact testimony—“my villagers will run out of food soon”—corroborated what the numbers said: the situation was already serious and would only get worse.
The most glaring aspect of this ordeal is that unlike a natural disaster or war, the evidence that such a food crisis could occur was available in October. In its briefing document released June 28, DWB begins by asking, “Tens of thousands of lives threatened in Niger: where is the humanitarian assistance?” It continues, “No money, no food aid. Such is the reality today in Niger for families suffering from food shortages. And yet, the government and institutional donors had announced in October 2004 that one-quarter of the population – around 3.5 million people – were threatened by this serious crisis.” Pleas for aid have mostly been ignored, and now the disputed question is how to distribute the food. DWB and the World Food Program are calling for free distribution while the government has been subsidizing sales in worries that free food will threaten long-term food security. In the latest news, a UN representative who visited Niger this week said, “The response of the international community to the Niger tragedy has been shown to be totally insufficient.”
While DWB questions the response of other international development organizations and the Nigerien government, it has managed quite well on its own. To handle the influx of severely malnourished children, nearly triple the number of children treated than at this time last year, DWB has increased its capacity, opening four more malnutrition clinics, including one in Dakoro, and expanding its ambulatory, outpatient capabilities.
The food crisis has now reached its breaking point. Rainy season has begun promisingly, and if the rainfall continues to accumulate at its current pace, famine will be averted.
The alternative is unthinkable.
On The Edge
I have done my best to convey this problem—people need food—that at first seems so simple yet becomes more and more complex once you begin to mull it over. The paradox is that action must be taken swiftly to prevent people from hopelessly dying, yet the delicate measures that need to be taken to insure that Nigeriens do not depend on aid for survival require time to consider.
After living here for two years, I still am continually amazed by the fact that people live on the edge of the Sahara. The nomadic Tuareg and Fulani peoples still carry on their nomadic traditions as pastoral herders, some even venturing into the desert itself.
The closer you move to the endless seas of sand, the signs of civilization you spot—mud huts, rusted chassis, a lone man leading a donkey by his hand—begin to vanish. My urge is to grab that man by the shoulders and tell him to keep walking and get as far away from the desert as he possibly can.
Yet by some means people survive here with unparalleled fortitude and resourcefulness, treating death as just another incomprehensible fact of life. A typical greeting to mourners: “How is the thing that happened?” The answer: “Have patience.”
Insufferable Sadness
Having not dealt with death back home, volunteers are shocked when faced with its grim presence in Niger. The sadness is staggering. As volunteers in a country where one of four children die before the age of five, spending two years in a village where the meaning of such statistics is witnessed first hand places an understandable burden on each of us. The feeling of helplessness and powerlessness is overwhelming, and it is a difficult concept for our family and friends back home to grasp.
I talked to a volunteer who recently returned to the States, and she described the horror in her friends’ eyes when she told them about the suffering in her village.
“They cannot understand why I didn’t do anything,” she said. “They cannot understand why I would watch it all happen.”
We volunteers are not doctors. We are not loan officers. We are just bright-eyed do-gooders with adventure coursing through our veins. When villagers ask us for medication, we generally refuse. When they ask us for money, we say no even more forcefully. But, in some cases, for those Nigeriens whom we call our friends, who have shown us such unconditional love and patience during our stay in their country, it would break our hearts if we did not help. We understand that for them to approach us for medicine, money, or food violates their personal and cultural values. We understand that it is truly their last hope.
But just imagine if one volunteer decided to buy sacks of grain and distribute them indiscriminately in his or her village. Perhaps certain families would accuse the volunteer of favoritism toward certain families, or maybe the village chief, because he owns the most fertile farmland in the entire village, would decide his family deserves more food than others. It is conceivable that neighboring villages, hearing the news that some white person is giving out free food, would send out representatives to demand their fair share. Two things are certain, regardless of what happens: The volunteer’s credibility is shattered, and the reputation of Peace Corps as a development organization is endangered.
The village in this example is a microcosm in the current debate about aid to Africa. I am frankly tired of all the grandstanding when it comes to this discussion. When a rock star meets with politicians, perhaps he should scrap his shades and leather jacket for a suit and tie. The bottom line is alleviating poverty is not a cut-and-dry exercise. It is not a noble exercise, but one in humility. Simple proclamations and shocking statistics are beneficial for the headlines, but kind words and photo opportunities do not save lives. We must admit that we may not have the answers. We must admit that we do not know if our actions will end up doing any good.
I cannot ponder these issues for too long, or I would go crazy. Whenever my mind gets too heavy, I think of one of my favorite movies, Groundhog Day, featuring my favorite actor, Bill Murray. In the film, Murray plays Phil Connors, a miserable, egotistical weatherman who is fated to live the same day over and over again before he gets it right—meaning, among other things, he performs the Heimlich maneuver on an overzealous steak eater, learns how to sculpt magnificent figures in ice with a chainsaw, buys an entire insurance portfolio from hapless Ned Ryerson, and, predictably, gets the girl. Yet before performing all these feats, he must abandon one of his dreams: saving the life of a homeless man. He feeds him and takes him to the hospital, but the man’s ultimate fate is to die on that Groundhog Day.
I close with a paragraph from William Langwiesche’s excellent book Sahara Unveiled: “The Sahara is the earth stripped of its gentleness, a place that consumes the careless and unlucky. But all you need to navigate it is a suitcase, a bit of cash, an occasional bus ticket, the intention to move on. Such a simplicity appeals to me….The route [through the Sahara] would take me through the desert’s hyperarid core—a place where plateaus nearly sterilized by drought, where bacteria cannot survive, and where cadavers, partially mummified, decompose slowly like sun-dried dates. The Sahara has horizons so bare that drivers mistake stones for diesel trucks, and so lonely that migrating birds land beside people just for the company. I lay in Algiers in a hotel in a storm, thinking there is not better sound than the splash of rain. The desert teaches by taking away.”
That desert, remember, is the size of the United States, and rather slowly but quite surely, it is moving southward. For such forces, we do not have an answer. In fact, we do not even have a prayer.